Backend & Database · 8 alternatives ranked of 20 in the category
Looking for alternatives to Context.dev? These are the backend & database tools that score highest on adoption, reviews, benchmarks, and public code, with what separates each one from Context.dev.
Ranked by adoption, review, benchmark, and repository signals. Each note below is drawn from the two products’ own catalog records, so a product with nothing to separate it from Context.dev carries no note.
Supabase is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not, has a public repository with 111k stars, and shows 7 recorded adoptions against Context.dev's 0.
MongoDB Atlas shows 6 recorded adoptions against Context.dev's 0.
MindsDB is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not and has a public repository with 40k stars.
Convex is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not and has a public repository with 13k stars.
MCP Toolbox for Databases is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not, is open source against Context.dev's freemium model, and has a public repository with 17k stars.
Supabase ranks highest among the alternatives to Context.dev we track. Supabase is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not, has a public repository with 111k stars, and shows 7 recorded adoptions against Context.dev's 0. Postgres, auth, storage, realtime, and vector extensions for app backends.
Yes. Supabase, MindsDB, Convex, MCP Toolbox for Databases, Neon, Scalar, and Trigger.dev are listed as open source in our catalog. Context.dev is not listed as open source. Supabase is the highest ranked of them: Postgres, auth, storage, realtime, and vector extensions for app backends.
Neon is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not and has a public repository with 23k stars.
Scalar is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not and has a public repository with 16k stars.
Trigger.dev is listed as open source, while Context.dev is not and has a public repository with 17k stars.