tokens&
BrowseFor enterprises
Submit an offer
tokens&

Find tools, check provider offers, save a build plan, and share your work when you’re ready.

For buildersFor enterprises

For builders

  • Product launches
  • Builder projects
  • Startup credits and perks
  • Agent Skills
  • Published agents
  • API and agent docs
  • Publish a project

For enterprises

  • Start free company workspace
  • Submit a tool, product, or perk

Community

  • Community
  • Newsletter
  • Events
Xin

© 2026 tokensand, LLC. All rights reserved.

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security
  • Data Processing
  • Status
  1. Home
  2. Tools
  3. AI Agents
  4. LibreChat
LibreChat logo

LibreChat

AI Agents

Open-source multi-provider AI chat platform with agents, MCP, skills, model switching, and self-hosted team workflows.

Visit websiteDocs

Related tools

Explore products with related capabilities. Check their details for your use case.

Browse the category
HKUDS/nanobot logo
HKUDS/nanobot

AI Agents· nanobot.wiki

Open source

Ultra-lightweight, open-source, self-hosted personal AI agent framework in Python with WebUI, tools, memory, MCP, multi-agent workflows, automation, and chat apps

Mcp
Compare for your team
Request vendor intro
Is this your company?Verify ownership · Add products · See activity
OverviewProduct evaluationBuild examplesResourcesCompany evidence

Product evaluation

Review LibreChat for your team’s requirements before a technical pilot.

Commercial model

Open source

View vendor website

Listed pricing category. Confirm current rates, limits and enterprise contract terms with the vendor.

Implementation

API listed · Open source listed

DocumentationSource repository

Validate integration, deployment and operational requirements in your own environment.

Enterprise review

Security, data handling, support and contract terms require vendor confirmation. Linked sources do not establish certification or approval.

Public implementation evidence

Built with LibreChat

Projects that list this product. Use is self-reported.

Judging lockedEvent-linked buildSource: https://luma.com/cyberhackSubmissions are locked for judging after the event close.
KE
kenilhimmatbhai.vaghasiyaabout 1 month ago
GHOST

GHOST proves your detection works instead of assuming it does. What we built: six red-team agents (recon, network scan, injection, auth bypass, DoS/resilience, business-logic abuse) run against TowerBank, a deliberately vulnerable sandbox app we built and own. Every action becomes a structured event. ClickHouse scores each event with windowed detection queries, labels it detected or missed, and streams live coverage % and mean-time-to-detect to a 3D siege view: shields flash when an attack is caught, and the tower takes damage when one slips through. How it works: every event travels two lanes at once. The visual lane (agent, coordinator, WebSocket) never waits on the database. The analytics lane (same event, ClickHouse, verdict) feeds the live stats. A volume replayer preloads millions of historical events so the numbers hold at scale. Guild.ai: the six agents are built with the Guild Agent SDK, published to Guild, and started as Guild sessions through the Guild API. Each returns a typed event stream that a forwarder posts to the coordinator. ClickHouse: detection verdicts, coverage and latency are analytical queries over the event table. LibreChat on top lets you ask "which attacks slipped through in the last run?" in plain English. Semgrep: we scanned our AI-generated target code and wrote up the most interesting finding.

Listed tools (7)

Scroll for more
  • Guild.aiThe control plane for AI agents
  • LibreChatOpen-source multi-provider AI chat platform with agents, MCP, skills, model switching, and self-hosted team workflows.
  • ClickHousependingAI Dev Platforms tool
  • SemgreppendingAI Dev Platforms tool
  • PPostgrespendingAI Dev Platforms tool
  • TTypeScriptpendingAI Dev Platforms tool
  • PPipendingAI Dev Platforms tool
0 0 0Open
Company evaluation and adoption evidence

Enterprise fit

Buyer brief for procurement and architecture review

Source-labeled signals for cost, reliability, security, integration, and adoption proof. Missing compliance evidence is shown as a gap, not guessed.

Compare for enterpriseExport brief
Inferred

Commercial model

Open source profile signal; exact enterprise terms need buyer review.

View source
Needs verification

Reliability

No status page, uptime, or SLA evidence attached

Buyer recommendation

Shortlist only after verifying Reliability and Security/compliance.

API signal supports workflow automation.Docs are linked for implementation review.Open-source path can reduce lock-in review.At least one buyer evidence source is linked or verified.

Real data backfill while adoption proof grows

These are source-linked enrichment paths for missing fields. They are treated as proxies until claimed-company data and first-party tokens& adoption events replace them.

GitHub repository APIfreeStars, forks, license, topics, releases, default branch, repo freshness, and public contributor signal.OpenSSF ScorecardfreeOpen-source security posture checks for repos before enterprise review.Wikidata company graph

AgentRank trust profile

Public proof buyers and agents can trust

AgentRank

51

Public signals · ★ 46,846

Trust Score

47

observed

Category Rank

#8

AI Agents · public signals

Protocols

API, SDK

Agent-readable metadata

Tracked Developers

0

Known active developer activity

Profile Status

Unclaimed

Owner action needed

Trust Registry

AgentRank evidence file
observed

Source breakdown

GitHub46,846

68% confidence

Protocol support

APISDK
Adoption over time
Last 8 weeks+1,431 GitHub stars in 30d · cohort private · trust 47

Timeline appears after verified events.

We do not draw a fake adoption chart before live usage, self-reported proof, or challenge activity exists for this product.

Private (N<7)

active developers

Private (N<7)

verified adoptions

Private (N<7)

retention

Growth and Enterprise capabilities

Developer identities, account mapping, retention cohorts, and competitor overlap are available on Growth and Enterprise plans.

Talk to sales
Developer identities
See the builders behind saves, docs clicks, API calls, and retained usage.
Account map
Resolve developer activity into companies, teams, and enterprise accounts.
Retention cohorts
Track first API call through 7/30/90-day retention and expansion.
Competitor overlap
Find developers evaluating alternatives and switching between tools.
Category benchmark
Compare activation, retention, and growth against your market.
Resources
Websitewebsite

Official LibreChat site.

DocumentationDocs

LibreChat documentation.

GitHubGitHub

Open-source LibreChat repository.

Company details

Sign in to follow this company, vote for its product, or save it to your workspace.

Community support for LibreChat. Votes do not verify product usage.

Pricing
Open source
Open source
Yes
API available
Yes

GitHub Stats

Stars
46,846
Forks
9,645
Issues
1,147
49,708
8,705
Open source
Tabby logo
Tabby

AI Agents· tabbyml.com

Open source

Self-hosted AI coding assistant for code completion, chat, and team-managed developer workflows.

33,923
1,796
Open source
Open WebUI logo
Open WebUI

AI Agents· openwebui.com

Open source

Open-source self-hosted AI interface and app platform for model routing, local or hosted LLM workflows, and OpenRouter-compatible chat apps.

157,883
22,953
Open source
Skyvern logo
Skyvern

AI Agents· skyvern.com

Freemium

AI browser automation platform for workflows that need computer-use style web actions, extraction, and hosted or self-hosted agents.

23,340
2,235
Open source

Keep evaluating LibreChat

Comparisons, category adoption data, and shortlist guides that answer the questions this profile raises next.

Check the adoption evidence

  • AI Agents developers actually keep usingFiltered to products with verified usage events, cohort breadth, and retention.
  • AgentRank category rankingsHow every category is ordered by adoption proof, trust, and protocol support.
  • Best AI Agent FrameworksShortlist guide for this category, with the tradeoffs written out.
  • Best Open Source AI ToolsShortlist guide for this category, with the tradeoffs written out.

Own LibreChat? Generate its adoption badge embed, or claim the profile to send verified usage events.

Needs verification

Security/compliance

No security, trust, or compliance source attached

Source linked

Integration fit

API profile signal with implementation source linked

View source
Inferred

Adoption proof

1 recorded adoption event; verification is not established

Vendor value loop

Vendors receive anonymous aggregate evaluation demand by default. Account details are shared only after explicit buyer contact or consent.

Request vendor contact
free
Parent company, acquisition, and ownership hints to avoid misleading same-owner comparisons.

Agent-readable protocol evidence raises trust and commercial readiness.

Benchmark proof

Automated measurements unavailable

Automated performance measurements are unavailable until a separately verified empirical evaluator is configured. Community reports do not unlock this component.

Trust gaps

Verify publisher ownership
Send SDK/API telemetry
Automated performance measurements unavailable

Enterprise verification can enrich evidence and export proof packages, but cannot buy rank.

Next best action

Verify ownership to manage LibreChat.

Review aggregate activity and connect product usage evidence. Private reports retain their existing permissions and plan requirements.

Public projects and activity accumulate here before your company joins. Claim this existing profile to manage it and review aggregate activity.

Claim this tool to review aggregate activity
Recommended actions
Prioritized DevRel, product, and sales plays based on live adoption signals.