Developer decision Enterprise evaluation

Dify vs Langflow

Side-by-side comparison of Dify and Langflow across fit, pricing, docs, evidence gaps, and benchmarks.

Decision brief

Best overall

Dify

Best combined signal across API availability, docs, adoption, reviews, and ecosystem proof.

Best OSS/self-hosted

Dify

Start here when local control, inspectability, or self-hosting matters.

Best managed/production

Dify

Strongest shortlist signal for API availability, docs, and operational maturity.

Decision notes

Adoption proof: No verified adoption proof yet

Reviews: No developer reviews yet

Repo stars: Langflow

Check before choosing

Dify has no developer reviews yet.Dify has no public adoption proof yet.Langflow has no developer reviews yet.Langflow has no public adoption proof yet.

Evidence links

Dify docs Dify repo Langflow docs Langflow repo

Missing evidence and weekly return

Dify: verified adoptionDify: benchmark dataLangflow: verified adoptionLangflow: benchmark data

Save this comparison to watch rank movement, new alternatives, docs changes, examples, and benchmark updates.

Next stepBuild packet and draft write-up

Turn this Dify vs Langflow decision into something you can build from.

Most developers reading a head-to-head are picking what to ship this week. Take the Dify vs Langflow decision into a build packet with the setup steps for whichever one you choose, and draft a short write-up of how it went so the next person deciding this has something concrete to read.

Comparing Dify vs Langflow

Dify docs Dify GitHub Langflow docs Langflow GitHub

Build packet Draft proof page

Feature Comparison

Dify

Agent Frameworks

Pricing: Freemium
Open source: Yes
API: Available
Rating: No reviews
GitHub: 146,650 stars
Adoption: Public evidence pending
Benchmark: No benchmark data
Best for: Open-source platform for building agentic workflows, RAG apps, and LLM application backend
Tradeoff: More control and inspectability, but more setup and operational ownership.

Langflow

Agent Frameworks

Pricing: Open source
Open source: Yes
API: Available
Rating: No reviews
GitHub: 150,154 stars
Adoption: Public evidence pending
Benchmark: No benchmark data
Best for: Visual Python framework for building and deploying agentic and RAG applications with reusa
Tradeoff: More control and inspectability, but more setup and operational ownership.

Feature	Dify	Langflow
Category	Agent Frameworks	Agent Frameworks
Pricing	Freemium	Open source
Open source
API available
Rating	No reviews	No reviews
GitHub stars	146,650	150,154
Adoption	Public evidence pending	Public evidence pending
Benchmark	No benchmark data	No benchmark data
Best for	Open-source platform for building agentic workflows, RAG apps, and LLM application backend	Visual Python framework for building and deploying agentic and RAG applications with reusa
Developer tradeoff	More control and inspectability, but more setup and operational ownership.	More control and inspectability, but more setup and operational ownership.

Sponsored perks may appear below, but comparison order, evidence, and decision guidance are not bought placements. Decisions weigh verified usage, public product evidence, projects, saves, comparisons, and buyer requirements. Buyer shortlists stay private unless contact is requested.

No live product opportunities yet

You can still use the workbench: build a stack, publish proof, and follow starter challenge programs. New credits, workshops, and launch programs appear here once companies publish them.

Feature

Dify

Langflow